Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tim Coddington's avatar

Love this write up on Mulberry! They are such generous trees, and I agree that they are misclassified as invasive!

One cool thing you can do is graft the males, so that they make fruit. I have tried to encourage Native plant enthusiasts to graft over white mulberry to the native red mulberry, so they can produce the native mulberries and allow the birds to spread their seed.

For the most part folks ignore this option, and would rather just kill them. I love native plant enthusiasts, but sometimes it seems like they feel like removal is the only good option.

Expand full comment
Ruben Bix's avatar

Thanks for this. Why? Because your common-sense reasoning about invasives, coming from somebody who knows what they're talking about is helpful in clarifying my own thoughts (which seem to coincide with yours). A couple of years ago I got a phone app for identifying plants. I was especially interested in wildflowers and I quickly found out that hardly anything in the Bay Area is a native, even the various grasses that cover our beautiful rolling hills. At the same time, I noticed all these anti-invasive warriors hard at work killing everything that isn't a native plant in San Francisco public parks. The park we live closest to is thankfully one that's left unmanicured and with little in the way of Rec and Park landscaping. Because of this there are whole troops of civic-minded do-gooders unconnected with the City who I observe marching around digging up the poor little flowers I enjoy seeing and that the gophers seem to enjoy eating. I've even seen some of these anti-invasive zealots spraying roundup on our hill. I've been tempted to speak to them but not knowing what I'm talking about has so-far made me repress the urge.

Expand full comment
5 more comments...

No posts